The Role of International Human Law in Armed Conflicts Involving Non- State Actors an Analytical Study

Abstract

International Humanitarian Law (IHL) holds a paramount position in regulating armed
conflicts that involve non-state actors. As non-state armed groups are on the rise and their
participation in conflicts becomes more prevalent, it becomes imperative to ensure that these
actors are bound by the same rules and principles as state actors. The cardinal principles of
IHL, including but not limited to the principle of distinction, proportionality, and necessity,
are applicable to all involved parties in an armed conflict, irrespective of their status as state
or non-state actors. The involvement of non-state armed groups in conflicts is on the rise,
presenting distinctive challenges to the implementation of IHL. Due to the lack of a
centralized command structure and non-adherence to IHL principles, it becomes strenuous to
hold these actors accountable for their actions. However, recent advancements in
international law, such as the International Criminal Court's jurisdiction over non-state actors,
have fortified the legal framework for holding these actors responsible for their actions